Furman University - Letter Grade Distribution (Fall) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Average |
Std. Dev. |
% A |
% B |
% C |
% D |
% F |
|
|
|
1951 |
2.41 |
1.05 |
14 |
36 |
33 |
11 |
6 |
|
|
|
1952 |
2.41 |
1.05 |
14 |
36 |
33 |
11 |
6 |
|
|
|
1953 |
2.39 |
1.05 |
14 |
34 |
34 |
11 |
6 |
|
|
|
1954 |
2.24 |
1.09 |
12 |
30 |
35 |
14 |
8 |
|
|
|
1955 |
2.25 |
1.09 |
12 |
31 |
34 |
14 |
8 |
|
|
|
1956 |
2.32 |
1.05 |
13 |
31 |
36 |
13 |
6 |
|
|
|
1957 |
2.35 |
1.02 |
13 |
32 |
37 |
13 |
5 |
|
|
|
1958 |
2.31 |
1.08 |
13 |
32 |
35 |
13 |
7 |
|
|
|
1959 |
2.27 |
1.06 |
12 |
30 |
37 |
13 |
7 |
|
|
|
1960 |
2.26 |
1.09 |
12 |
31 |
35 |
13 |
8 |
|
|
|
1961 |
2.18 |
1.06 |
10 |
28 |
39 |
14 |
8 |
|
|
|
1962 |
2.27 |
1.03 |
11 |
31 |
40 |
12 |
7 |
|
|
|
1963 |
2.27 |
1.00 |
10 |
31 |
40 |
12 |
6 |
|
|
|
1964 |
2.22 |
1.07 |
11 |
29 |
38 |
13 |
8 |
|
|
|
1965 |
2.23 |
1.07 |
11 |
30 |
37 |
13 |
8 |
|
|
|
1966 |
2.29 |
1.01 |
10 |
33 |
39 |
12 |
6 |
|
|
|
1967 |
2.36 |
1.03 |
13 |
33 |
35 |
13 |
5 |
|
|
|
1968 |
2.35 |
1.06 |
13 |
33 |
35 |
12 |
6 |
|
|
|
1969 |
2.48 |
1.01 |
16 |
36 |
34 |
10 |
4 |
|
|
|
1970 |
2.55 |
1.00 |
18 |
35 |
34 |
10 |
3 |
|
|
|
1971 |
2.60 |
1.00 |
19 |
38 |
31 |
9 |
3 |
|
|
|
1972 |
2.72 |
0.96 |
23 |
38 |
31 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
1973 |
2.79 |
0.95 |
25 |
39 |
28 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
|
1974 |
2.69 |
1.02 |
23 |
38 |
26 |
9 |
3 |
|
|
|
1975 |
2.75 |
1.02 |
26 |
38 |
26 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
|
1976 |
2.82 |
0.98 |
27 |
39 |
27 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
1977 |
2.73 |
1.02 |
24 |
38 |
27 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
1978 |
2.73 |
0.99 |
24 |
38 |
28 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
|
1979 |
2.74 |
1.03 |
25 |
39 |
25 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
|
1980 |
2.72 |
1.02 |
24 |
39 |
26 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
|
1981 |
2.70 |
1.01 |
22 |
39 |
27 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
|
1982 |
2.74 |
0.97 |
23 |
40 |
28 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
1983 |
2.66 |
1.01 |
22 |
38 |
29 |
9 |
3 |
|
|
|
1984 |
2.69 |
0.99 |
22 |
37 |
30 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
1985 |
2.70 |
0.96 |
21 |
39 |
30 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
1986 |
2.78 |
0.93 |
23 |
41 |
27 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
|
1987 |
2.79 |
0.91 |
23 |
42 |
28 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
1988 |
2.86 |
0.88 |
25 |
43 |
26 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1989 |
2.89 |
0.89 |
26 |
44 |
24 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1990 |
2.90 |
0.89 |
27 |
44 |
24 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1991 |
2.86 |
0.91 |
26 |
42 |
25 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1992 |
2.92 |
0.85 |
30 |
42 |
23 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1993 |
2.94 |
0.85 |
29 |
42 |
23 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
1994 |
2.98 |
0.85 |
31 |
43 |
21 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1995 |
2.94 |
0.86 |
31 |
41 |
22 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1996 |
2.93 |
0.84 |
29 |
44 |
22 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1997 |
2.96 |
0.86 |
32 |
42 |
21 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1998 |
3.00 |
0.85 |
33 |
43 |
18 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
1999 |
3.02 |
0.87 |
32 |
44 |
19 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
2000 |
3.03 |
0.83 |
34 |
43 |
18 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
2001 |
3.11 |
0.77 |
36 |
45 |
15 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
3.14 |
0.76 |
38 |
44 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
2003 |
3.15 |
0.75 |
39 |
44 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
2004 |
3.16 |
0.76 |
39 |
44 |
14 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
2005 |
3.19 |
0.75 |
41 |
44 |
13 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
2006 |
3.20 |
0.73 |
41 |
44 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
2007 |
3.22 |
0.74 |
43 |
42 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
2008 |
3.17 |
0.79 |
41 |
42 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
2009 |
3.15 |
0.79 |
40 |
42 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
2010 |
3.19 |
0.77 |
41 |
43 |
12 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
2011 |
3.17 |
0.80 |
42 |
41 |
14 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Data based on reports from the Furman
Archives and Furman Planning & Institutional Research Office. |
2. The percentages are rounded to the nearest
whole number, and only incorporate A-F grades. |
In other words,
other symbols such as I and W are not considered. |
|
|
|
3. Before 1952, F carried the same number of
quality points as D. Therefore, the
average grade in 1951 |
at the time
would have been considered as 2.47 (or a 1.47 on a 3-point scale). |
|
|
4. Starting in 1992, average grades include
plus/minus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|