The Sedition Act is in Chapter 290 of the Statutes of Singapore. It was last revised
in 1985.
In September 2005, the Sedition Act was first used on individuals when three men, including a
teenager, were charged for making seditious and inflammatory racist comments on the Internet.
Selected text
Seditious tendency.
- 3. —(1) A seditious tendency is a tendency —
- (a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;
- (b) to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration,
otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;
- (c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in
Singapore;
- (d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;
- (e) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of
Singapore.
- (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), any act, speech, words, publication or other thing shall not be deemed to be seditious
by reason only that it has a tendency —
- (a) to show that the Government has been misled or mistaken in any of its measures;
- (b) to point out errors or defects in the Government or the Constitution as by law established or in legislation or in the
administration of justice with a view to the remedying of such errors or defects;
- (c) to persuade the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure by lawful means the
alteration of any matter in Singapore; or
- (d) to point out, with a view to their removal, any matters producing or having a tendency to produce feelings of ill-will
and enmity between different races or classes of the population of Singapore,
- if such act, speech, words, publication or other thing has not otherwise in fact a seditious tendency.
- (3) For the purpose of proving the commission of any offense under this Act, the intention of the person charged at the
time he did or attempted to do or made any preparation to do or conspired with any person to do any act or uttered any seditious
words or printed, published, sold, offered for sale, distributed, reproduced or imported any publication or did any other thing
shall be deemed to be irrelevant if in fact such act had, or would, if done, have had, or such words, publication or thing had a
seditious tendency.
Provision against racist comments
Subsection 3 of the Act describes the types of publication that have seditious tendency and these includes publication that
"promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes". Singapore takes social cohesion and
racial harmony in the country seriously because of its history of racial riots in
the 1960s. More recent events of racial violence in neighboring Indonesia in the late 1990s
and early 2000s also serve as reminders of potential inter-racial conflicts in the region.
Cases in 2005
In September 2005, the Sedition Act was first used on individuals when two men were charged for making seditious and inflammatory racist comments on the Internet. The two men are Nicholas Lim Yew, 25, and Benjamin Koh Song Huat, 27. They made their remarks on
Internet forums in response to a letter printed in The Straits Times.
On July 14, The Straits Times published a letter from a Muslim woman asking
if cab companies allowed uncaged pets to be transported in taxis, after she saw a dog standing on a taxi seat next to its owner.
She said that "dogs may drool on the seats or dirty them with their paws". Her concerns had a religious basis as according
to Ustaz Ali Haji Mohamed, chairman of Khadijah mosque, who
pointed out that: "There are various Islamic schools of thought which differ in views. But most Muslims in Singapore are from
the Syafie school of thought. This means they are not allowed to touch dogs which are wet, which
would include a dog's saliva. This is a religious requirement.".
Two days later, on an online forum for Singaporean dog lovers www.doggiesite.com, Lim posted anti-Muslim remarks that allegedly "had a seditious tendency to promote feelings of ill-will and
hostility between different classes of the population in Singapore", according the charges. He pleaded guilty and served one
day in jail and a fine of $5,000. [1]
The other man, Koh, is accused of making similar racist remarks filled with vulgarities and insulting to Malays and their
religion. He also pleaded guilty and was sentenced to one month imprisonment.
In passing the sentences to Koh and Lim on October 7, 2005,
Senior District Judge Richard Magnus said the two had crossed the red line by wantonly breaching the basic ground rules. He said
passing a deterrent sentence was necessary so that such offending acts are tackled early and contained, adding that callous and
reckless remarks on racial or religious subjects had the potential to cause social disorder, regardless of which medium or forum
they are expressed.
On September 16, a third person, a 17 year old youth, was also charged with the Sedition Act for making racist remarks on his
blog site. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 months supervised probation that includes counseling sessions and community
service in the Malay community. [1]
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong later commented that such remarks will not be
tolerated, even if posted on the Internet. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs Wong Kan Seng
said that the Sedition Act was under review to see if it should be strengthened or renewed.
Event in 2006
In June 2006, it was reported that a 21-year-old blogger going by the moniker of "Char" was under police investigation for
posting cartoons of Jesus Christ on the Internet. [2] He was later let off with a stern warning from the police. [3]
See also
References
- ^ "Third racist
blogger sentenced to 24 months supervised probation", Channel NewsAsia, 23 November 2005.
- ^ "Jesus cartoons could draw jail for Singapore blogger", AFP, 14 June 2006.
- ^ Popatlal, Asha (2006-07-20). Blogger
given serious warning for posting cartoons of Jesus Christ. Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved on 2006-07-20.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)